theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re:WQ Judge and the dead Blavatsky/K Tingley and the discarnate Judge

Feb 23, 1998 09:27 PM
by Jerry Hejka-Ekins


David Green wrote:

> JHE-------
> No time now to
> respond to posting.
> But will answer part of
> 1.  Ms Eklund maybe private
> person but she's posted
> on this public forum.  She
> answered months ago to queries
> on Judge Case.  I couldn't
> find her email so I asked for it
> on same forum.  Her email add.
> was no secret to subscribers.
> I didn't have it so I asked.
> Is that improper?
>

Don't ask me.  Ask Ms. Eklund.

> Since posting Neresheimer----Judge
> letters, some readers have
> emailed thanking me for posting what
> they knew nothing about.  What's
> negative with that?
>

The issue isn't posting new (to readers) documents.  The issue is
responsible writing.

> In regards to context, what
> earthshattering context info would
> change major points of
> letters?  I'll go over this soon.
>

Depends on the document, but typical important factors are: the date the
document was written; the place the document was written; whether the
document was written by the signer or by a secretary; to whom the document
was sent ect. etc. etc.

jhe



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application