Theos-Talk Archives (February 1998 Message tt00322)

Dear David,

Obviously,  you are not only trying to get me to do your research for
you, but you are also trying to manipulate me into a debate with some
party not known to me.  Sorry, but I'm not interested in playing your
game.  Find another sucker to entertain you and to do your work for
you.  Regarding the Rajah/Judge issue, read my last VERY carefully, and
you will find that I was not saying that Judge was not identified as
Rajah.  I'll leave it to you to figure out what that means.  If you
can't, then I'm sorry about that too.

JHE


David Green wrote:

> I recd. 4 emails from
> readers who declare
> W Judge was known as----Rajah.
> Among references were
> "Theosophy"---May 1896----
>
> "the Rajah---as the real
> W.Q.J. was so often called"
> wrote "T."
> &
> "He was called by some
> The Rajah."
> wrote E Neresheimer.
>
> I don't possess Theosophy
> journal but J Belcher
> promises to send issues
> of April thru June 1896
> full of tribute
> articles on W Judge
> soon after his death.
>
> I quote from another corresp. The
> note has relevant details------
>
> >collating the material.  Yes, he thinks he
> >knows the esoteric truth about W.Q.J. but he
> >can't even get the exoteric, historical facts
> >straight!  Judge was residing in New York in
> >early Jan. 1895 (PATH magazine Feb. 1895 documents this).
> >He was also known to his intimates as Rajah.
> >(I will send you one E.S.T. circular of 1896
> >showing this.)  Also he confuses a *printed*
> >circular with a *handwritten* letter. There's more!
> >Be sure to write John.  I think I gave you his
> >address in my last.  He has a treasure
> >chest of W.Q.J.'s papers.  He will be straight
> >with you and won't give you that kind of
> >crap about too esoteric. I'll photocopy the items
> >you requested and send airmail Monday.  Also you
>
> More W Judge/Mrs Blavatsky
> documents to follow. Have
> decided to have web site
> with all W Judge papers
> I can find on these
> matters.
>
> D Green
>