Theos-Talk Archives (February 1998 Message tt00282)

David Green wrote:


>I recd. 4 emails from
>readers who declare
>W Judge was known as----Rajah.
>Among references were
>"Theosophy"---May 1896----
>
>"the Rajah---as the real
>W.Q.J. was so often called"
>wrote "T."
>&
>"He was called by some
>The Rajah."
>wrote E Neresheimer.


There is no detailed knowledge but rather suggestive hint that the
personality of W. Q. Judge was not the Raja, it is his Higher Ego that
included the latter as one of its rays. This fact, however, doesn't
contradict his being called Rajah.

Extracts from  Dialogue of  G. de Purucker  November 27, 1929

"Student : .... Do I understand correctly that the soul which filled the
body of the one whom we have learned to know as Mr. Judge, was at the same
time filling the body of the Raja? If this is so, how could it happen that
this soul could be attracted to the two bodies at the same time? Also, I
understand that the Raja died before Mr. Judge did. Was this not a relief to
Mr. Judge? And why was it not a chance for his poor, tired, and sick body to
pick up a bit? Please tell us more about this.

G. de P. : .... Now, I do not like to say much about Mr. Judge's case, for
the reason that there is a mystery there, to which Mr. Judge himself has but
faintly alluded. But the mere passing, the dying, of the Hindu prince called
the Raja would not necessarily at all increase or better the state of health
which Mr. Judge himself had, because that was another body entirely. A ray
of sunlight failing upon you might comfort you with its warmth and light and
in other ways be pleasing to you and helpful; but another ray of sunlight,
another ray of light, from the same luminary, might have a very different
effect upon one who is lying on a sick bed. That is what I mean. "

Visanu