Theos-Talk Archives (January 1998 Message tt00375)

>Mr. Gore loves to hug trees.  He would be an ideal candidate to bring in the
>AGE OF AQUARIUS, don't you think?  Then if he screws up, Gingrich will be
>there.  The Masters, may not intervene, but don't you think they might be
>saying;  "what fools these mortals be?"
>
>I know Brenda was talking about an INNER world government, or I think so
>anyway.  Maybe that is what spirituality is "inner" world governement of the
>individual to over come egotism and reveal the light of spirit in the daily
>life.  Political solutions have never worked.  Maybe in the sixth race, now
>being formed on this continent and Australia we will see people who need
>neither punishment or welfare.  But what cleansing catastrophe will be
>necessary to get us there?  Any ideas?

Keith,

Do you remember the last post I put up about the SD Vol II, Stanzas I-IV?
The story was about how nature came up with approximations to man, but
these were so unsatisfactory that "flames" came to earth and destroyed
them. After putting up this message, I thought about the situation a little
more, and I was wondering if this wasn't already accomplished on a higher
turn of the spiral. The one written of in the SD (above) would have been a
cataclysm before mankind's first race. While some of the dinosaurs shown on
p. 815 in the back of Vol. II are listed in erroneous time periods.

"The age of dinosaurs began more than 225 million years ago, in the middle
of the Triassic Period, the age of transition, when thecodont reptiles gave
way to dinosaurs, their descendants and long-time contemporaries." This
quote is from DINOSAURS PAST AND PRESENT, published by the Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County.

HPB gives time periods on p. 710 Vol II that she calls rough approximations
and this chart shows Laurentian and Cambrian in a category called
Primordial which would have been Third Round. If we receded 220 million
years in this approximation we reach somewhere into the Primordial and
Triassic, according to this chart would only have been less than 45 million
years ago.

I think it would be great if someone could revise this chart which compares
root races and Cambrian-Silurrian-Devonian-etc. equivalent to the time
expanse of the First and Second Root Races. If we have a revision of those
periods bringing them in consort with the ages as they are thought of
today, First and Second Races still would have been 148,800,000 years ago,
but instead of those races falling alongside the Silurian through Permian
Periods, they would fall approximately 75 million years after the first
dinosaurs roamed the earth, according to the reference above.

As much as I can appreciate the SD's description of  the earth being made
bare and the general slaughter, it fits into my scheme of thinking that
some of the earth was still populated with creatures. "They slew the forms
which were two and four-faced. They fought the goat-men, and the dog-headed
men, and the men with fishes' bodies." I'm looking at some of the dinosaurs
which lived millions of years ago and most are Jurassic through Cretaceous.
As is shown in the SD p. 815, prior to Triassic dinos there were reptiles
(water men?) and the Dimetrodon is the only one pictured, reportedly living
265 million years ago. Dilophosaurus lived during early Jurassic.
Regardless of these tidbits of info, if the general cataclysm took place to
rid the earth of "nature's unaided forms," then wouldn't there have had to
have been a similar cataclysm, perhaps taking place before the beginning of
the fifth root race, which would have destroyed the "unaided human
approximations of adepts?"

The cataclysm at the end of the fourth would have also had a purpose
similar to the one described in Stanzas I-IV for man, only this time the
forms would have been extinguished by flames from adept beings who then
would come themselves to produce their needed equipment (in the way of
bodies).

Anyway, I thought you might enjoy thinking through this side of the
question with me. Maybe you'll rest easier knowing we are under GOOD
direction.

Brenda