Re: Dependent or independent?
Jan 21, 1998 02:48 PM
by Nicholas Weeks
>it is amazing that so many people would
>justify letting people starve and die
>since giving them food/shelter and medicine
>would harm them (make them dependent).
>
>the issue is *never* whether or not to help them.
>The real issue is why do you not give them *more*? like
>an education, training, and a job they can support
>themselves on??
>
>john e. mead
Nonsense. Name someone on this list (or off) that wishes anyone to "starve
and die". True, the issue "is *never* whether or not to help," but *what* is
helpful.
Most of the time all we do is all talk anyway. How many on this list or
in this culture *personally* give food to those in real need? Do we look
out for what we can do *personally* or write a check? Do we do all we can
*personally*, face to face, or rely on the government? If we really
cared *personally* so deeply, would government programs even exist?
"Act individually and not collectively" advised HPB. See her KEY pp. 244-45.
Best,
--
Nicholas <> am455@lafn.org <> Los Angeles <> "The evil that has overtaken
souls has its source in self-will...They...largely indulged their own
motion; thus they were hurried down the wrong path...they came to lose
even the thought of their origin in the Divine." Plotinus
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application