Theos-Talk Archives (January 1998 Message tt00188)

At 05:57 AM 1/18/1998 -0800, Jerry Hejka-Ekins wrote:
>
>
>M K Ramadoss wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> BTW, this is the second time I hear of Gomes on the Internet. On theos-l,
>> there was a info posted by a subscriber as coming from Gomes on certain
>> details of Krishnamurti litigation matter. I did not think that the info
>> was correct. Hence I inquired with the msg poster and Gomes was supposed to
>> check the details and let the poster know. In spite of my public follow-up
>> with the poster, that was the last I heard on this matter.
>>
>> I hope this clarifies where I am coming from on this issue.
>>
>> MKRamadoss
>>
>>
>
>  Who was the subscriber?
>
>JJHE

To be fair to Gomes, in the instance mentioned, the following are the
possible scenarios, in view of the fact that the subscriber is a very
credible person.

1. Gomes may not have had time to research Krishnamurti litigation due to
higher priority research.

2. Gomes after researching may have found Krishnmurti litigation a very
touchy/sensitive political one especially with the current leadership of
TSA and BOD, as one of the  members of the Board of Directors of TSA was
one of the four people who sued Krishnamurti for $9 million and this is a
secret well kept from the members of TS for a long time. Gomes needs the
full cooperation and help from the current (and future BOD) both for access
to historical materials and publication help and hence keeping silent would
be the most prudent course of action for him to take as risks are too much.


mkr