Theos-Talk Archives (January 1998 Message tt00064)

Thoa writes:

Also, did you
>notice that Hegel's dialectism relate to Quantum and relativity theory,
>that one thing has to depend on another, that there can be no isolation?
>Just from those observations alone, we can see that the practical cannot do
>without the intuition and vice versa.  It takes the intuition to arrive at
>an answer quickly and the practical to prove it, to make sure that it's not
>just some foolish nonsense.  Even the practical can be foolish nonsense.
>Not because the facts aren't there, but because the factual and the
>concrete compartmentalize everything, instead of helping us see the whole.

The idea I find useful is to finally recognize that other beings exist and
not just by lumping us and them together in a whole and identifying with
it. I prefer to break down every thought I can (usually a group of words)
and then compartmentalize it either in the adept category or the human
category or perhaps if it isn't really thought, but something along the
lines of using the senses OR (this is a big difference) along the lines of
the Divine Plan, then I place it in the angelic category. I don't wish to
act from a fragmented vantage point, only think from one. My action can
remain as a "whole" or group effort. This way I can give credit where
credit is due, encourage balance, and receive the sacred.

>In that sense, the intuition is better at seeing the wholeness of things.
>Currently, we may not be able to traverse the universe in a spaceship, but
>we can do it with our minds.

Is there anyone there?