Theos-Talk Archives (November 1997 Message tt00452)

> Or, perhaps, that Krishnamurti was NOT a messenger of truth. Or perhaps
>that he did not say anything sufficiently important or new to be worth
>consideration. Or perhaps that he, himself did not consider himself to
>be such.
>
> From what I have been told, K. was far more impressive in person than
>he was in writings. I have seen videotapes of interviews and talks with
>him (they run every Thursday morning on New York public access cable),
>and, while I do think that he said good and important things, do not
>consider him to be on the caliber of a Buddha, a Moses, a Jesus, a
>Lao-Tse, a Confucius, a Mohammed, or even a Descartes. Possibly on the
>level of a Spinoza.
>
> Bart Lidofsky
>
...That is fine with me, Bart. Don't you know that we have freedom of
belief in the Theosophical Society?