Theos-Talk Archives (November 1997 Message tt00447)

Rodolfo Don wrote:
> The reason why some people (and organizations) don't consider K. as a
> messanger of truth, I covered that in previous posts: it's simply prejudice
> or conditionings.

 Or, perhaps, that Krishnamurti was NOT a messenger of truth. Or perhaps
that he did not say anything sufficiently important or new to be worth
consideration. Or perhaps that he, himself did not consider himself to
be such.

 From what I have been told, K. was far more impressive in person than
he was in writings. I have seen videotapes of interviews and talks with
him (they run every Thursday morning on New York public access cable),
and, while I do think that he said good and important things, do not
consider him to be on the caliber of a Buddha, a Moses, a Jesus, a
Lao-Tse, a Confucius, a Mohammed, or even a Descartes. Possibly on the
level of a Spinoza.

 Bart Lidofsky