theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re:Truth

Nov 30, 1997 02:28 PM
by Bart Lidofsky


Rodolfo Don wrote:
> The reason why some people (and organizations) don't consider K. as a
> messanger of truth, I covered that in previous posts: it's simply prejudice
> or conditionings.

 Or, perhaps, that Krishnamurti was NOT a messenger of truth. Or perhaps
that he did not say anything sufficiently important or new to be worth
consideration. Or perhaps that he, himself did not consider himself to
be such.

 From what I have been told, K. was far more impressive in person than
he was in writings. I have seen videotapes of interviews and talks with
him (they run every Thursday morning on New York public access cable),
and, while I do think that he said good and important things, do not
consider him to be on the caliber of a Buddha, a Moses, a Jesus, a
Lao-Tse, a Confucius, a Mohammed, or even a Descartes. Possibly on the
level of a Spinoza.

 Bart Lidofsky



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application