Re:"I AM" movement
Nov 10, 1997 06:46 AM
by K Paul Johnson
According to Mark Kusek:
> Being an artist with this wacky esoteric interest has led me to collect
> all
> sorts of these images. I have boxes of them from all over the place.
Well, would you agree that there is a valid distinction between
good and bad art, and kitsch seems to prevail in some brands of
"esoteric" art? It seems to me that *some* measure of the
profundity and value of a spiritual teaching (not necessarily
its literal truth) is the quality of the art it inspires.
Anthroposophy and Theosophy come out fine on that score; I AM,
not so good.
Am just trying to figure out the range of your collecting
interests and how much of it is tongue-in-cheek and how much
serious appreciation.
Cheers,
PJ
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application