Theos-Talk Archives (July 1997 Message tt00026)

"The great error lies in the assumption that HPB could have been
*both* right and wrong, that the Masters could have permitted
mis-statements of hers to pass uncorrected - allowed their
teachings to be misrepresented to humanity."

HPB did NOT claim infallibility, I do agree.  It is in the rest
of the sentence that the importance lies.  Would Masters permit
their teachings to be misrepresented? It does not imply that
Masters controlled HPB.  To correct a misstatement of philosophy
is not to control another being.  Nor does it suggest that the
Masters are "omniscient or omnipresent or omnipotent." Nor does
that carry forward to Buddha, Plato and Christ.